
Free Consultation
Matt Conner 
What happens when a routine visit to your favorite café or walking through a neighborhood park becomes an unexpected injury? Suddenly, questions of safety and responsibility loom large. That is where the legal concept of premises liability comes into the picture. At its core, a premises liability claim is a legal pathway for individuals injured on another’s property to seek compensation.
It rests on the principle that property owners must ensure their grounds are safe for visitors. From icy sidewalks that haven’t been salted to poorly lit stairwells in an office building, the scenarios that can lead to such claims are as varied as they are unexpected.
A premises liability claim arises when an individual is injured due to a property owner’s failure to maintain a safe environment. Whether you slipped and fell at the grocery store or had an accident at a friend’s house, knowing your rights is the first step toward seeking justice. Premises liability accidents encompass a wide range of scenarios, each highlighting the importance of property owners’ responsibilities towards maintaining their premises.
We’ve mentioned a couple of examples of what might constitute a premises liability claim. The most common we see can be categorized as follows:
These examples highlight the diverse scenarios giving rise to a premises liability claim, but it’s not an exhaustive list. If you believe you have a potential claim, contact Brett McCandlis Brown & Conner to schedule a consultation.
The duty a property owner owes to individuals on their property varies significantly based on the visitor’s status. Generally, these statuses are categorized as invitees, licensees, and trespassers, though the exact definitions and the duties owed to each can differ from state to state.
Invitees are individuals who enter a property with the owner’s express or implied permission for mutual benefit. This category typically includes customers in stores, guests in hotels, or attendees at public events. Property owners owe the highest duty of care to invitees, ensuring the premises are safe and warning of any known dangers.
A licensee enters the property for their own purposes but with the owner’s consent, such as social guests or door-to-door salespeople. The duty owed to licensees is to warn them of non-obvious dangers that the owner is aware of. Still, it typically does not extend to inspecting the property to discover dangers.
Trespassers enter without any right or permission. Generally, the property owner’s duty to trespassers is minimal, mainly to refrain from willful or wanton harm. However, a notable exception exists for child trespassers in some states, particularly in cases involving “attractive nuisances” like swimming pools, where owners must take steps to prevent foreseeable harm to children who might be drawn onto the property.
It’s crucial to understand that nuances in local laws can affect the specifics of your case. Property owners must be mindful of these distinctions and their implications for maintaining a safe environment for all visitors.
Proving negligence in a premises liability claim hinges on establishing four critical elements:
Crucial evidence in premises liability claims can include photos of the hazardous condition, maintenance records, witness statements, and surveillance footage. Additionally, medical records linking the injury to the accident on the premises are pivotal in establishing the extent of damages suffered. Together, these elements and pieces of evidence build a compelling case for negligence in premises liability claims.
Understanding how liability affects your potential lawsuit is crucial as laws vary by state. Most states rely on some form of comparative negligence. However, a handful of states use the very restrictive contributory negligence law.
Comparative negligence allows the injured party to recover damages even if they are partly at fault, with the compensation reduced by their percentage of fault. For example, if a court finds you to be 20% responsible for an accident, your awarded damages are reduced by 20%. Some states are pure comparative, meaning you can be 99% at fault and still collect 1% of your damages. Others cut off your right of recovery at 50% or 51% fault.
Contributory negligence bars recovery if you’re even 1% at fault. That can significantly impact the outcome of a claim, making it essential to understand the specific negligence laws in your state. For example, consider a slip and fall claim where the victim was 5% at fault.
In Washington, you would receive 95% of your damages. In a state with contributory negligence, you would receive nothing. An experienced Everett premises liability attorney can walk through this analysis with you and explain your right to recovery.
In a premises liability claim, the damages you can recover are generally categorized into economic, noneconomic, and, in some rare cases, punitive damages. Understanding these can provide insight into what compensation you might be entitled to for your injuries:
Each type of damage plays a crucial role in ensuring that victims of premises liability incidents are fully compensated for their injuries and the broader impacts on their lives.
Choosing the right legal representation after suffering a personal injury is a pivotal decision. At Brett McCandlis Brown & Conner, our approach sets us apart. With over 40 years of experience, we pride ourselves on providing real solutions to real problems, offering more than just legal advice—we offer a pathway to recovery.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a Washington premises liability accident, Brett McCandlis Brown & Conner is here to help. From the initial consultation to the final settlement or verdict, our team is committed to providing you with the support, guidance, and representation you deserve. Contact us today for a comprehensive evaluation of your case. Let us take on the legal burdens of a premises liability claim so you can focus on healing.
Matt Conner has a proven track record of success. Following his graduation from Willamette University with a double major in mathematics and economics, Matt worked as an economist for the Office of Economic Analysis for the State of Oregon before moving onto working in mortgage banking and real estate. Although Matt would move on to law school shortly thereafter, his experience in the financial sector has provided him with valuable experience in how to achieve maximum compensation for his clients.