
Free Consultation
Matt Conner 
Determining who is at fault in a T-bone accident in Washington often comes down to which driver failed to yield the right of way under state traffic laws. The driver who ran a red light, disregarded a stop sign, or made an improper left turn in front of oncoming traffic may be completely or partially at fault for the accident.
The Washington car accident lawyers at Brett McCandlis Brown & Conner have helped injured people for over 40 years. We understand the physical, emotional, and financial challenges a failure-to-yield accident can cause. You don’t have to spend your time fighting with insurance adjusters or figuring out what happened at the intersection. We can handle the investigation, identify potentially liable parties, and advocate for the compensation you need to move forward.
When two vehicles collide broadside in a side-impact crash, the scene is often chaotic. Drivers may give conflicting stories to police officers, and insurance companies may move quickly to minimize their responsibilities.
Proving liability in an intersection crash requires establishing legal negligence. You must prove the other motorist had a duty to drive safely, breached that duty, and directly caused the collision that resulted in your injuries and financial harm.
In a T-bone accident, Washington courts and insurers may consider applicable right-of-way statutes when determining which driver violated the law:
Establishing intersection accident fault requires a close examination of how each driver handled their statutory duties in the moments before impact.
T-bone collisions occur when the front end of one motor vehicle strikes the side panel of another. Because the sides of passenger cars provide far less structural protection and crumple space than the front hood or rear trunk, these crashes may cause catastrophic injuries.
Many intersection wrecks happen during specific driving maneuvers. Understanding these scenarios helps determine side-impact collision liability.
Left turns cause a high proportion of broadside collisions on multi-lane city streets and suburban intersections. Establishing left-turn accident fault typically focuses on whether the turning motorist waited for oncoming traffic to clear.
When a driver makes an unprotected left turn on a solid green light, they must yield to oncoming traffic that is within the intersection or close enough to be an immediate hazard. If that driver misjudges the speed of oncoming vehicles or attempts to beat traffic across oncoming lanes, they may be legally liable for the resulting side-impact crash.
Fault can occasionally shift if the oncoming driver was driving recklessly. For example, if the oncoming motorist was traveling significantly over the posted speed limit, drove at night with their headlights off, or ran a red light, that driver may share fault for the collision.
A failure-to-yield accident occurs when a motorist disregards the basic right-of-way rules established by signs, pavement markings, or traffic signals.
Common examples include:
When a driver pulls directly into an active travel lane without waiting for cross-traffic to pass, they may create a hazard that could lead to a severe T-bone collision.
Drivers who run red lights can potentially cause some of the most violent broadside collisions on public roads. These crashes frequently happen at high speeds when an inattentive driver tries to beat a late yellow light or fails to notice a light that has already turned red.
A motorist who enters an intersection after the signal turns red commits a traffic violation. If that entry contributes to causing a collision with a vehicle that lawfully entered on a green light, the driver who ran the red signal may be completely or partially at fault for the resulting damages.
In disputed cases where both drivers claim they had a green light, physical evidence and neutral witness accounts become critical in proving which driver actually had the legal right-of-way.
One of the biggest concerns crash victims have is whether sharing some blame will ruin their chance of recovering compensation. Washington applies “pure comparative fault,” also called pure comparative negligence, in personal injury claims, which generally allows a partially at-fault person to recover some compensation.
Under pure comparative fault:
For example, imagine you are crossing an intersection and another vehicle turns left directly across your path. A court determines that your compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering should equal $100,000. However, the jury finds that you were traveling 5 mph over the speed limit, assigning you 15% of the blame while finding the turning driver 85% at fault. Under Washington law, you still collect $85,000.
Because intersection collisions often feature finger-pointing and conflicting memories, physical evidence can be an important tool for proving negligence. Insurance adjusters and courts may evaluate several primary forms of evidence to recreate how the crash happened, including:
Because commercial surveillance footage may be overwritten within days and roadway skid marks can fade quickly, it’s important to act fast to preserve this evidence.
You should consult a Washington T-bone accident lawyer as soon as possible after receiving medical attention, especially when injuries are severe or when fault is disputed. Don’t sign anything or accept a settlement offer before you know the full scope of your injuries.
Washington has athree-year statute of limitations for most personal injury lawsuits resulting from a car crash. If you do not file a formal lawsuit within this three-year window, you may lose your right to pursue compensation in court.
Hiring legal counsel can help you navigate the claims process. A lawyer can handle communication with insurance adjusters, send preservation letters seeking to preserve relevant video and black-box evidence, consult respected accident reconstruction professionals, and build a compelling claim while you focus on healing.
Yes. Washington follows a pure comparative negligence standard under state law. Generally, you can still recover financial compensation even if you were partially responsible for causing the collision. However, your total compensation will be reduced in direct proportion to your assigned percentage of fault.
When drivers give conflicting accounts about traffic signals, objective evidence can become an important part of the investigation. Attorneys may use dashcam footage, nearby business security video, event data recorder information, witness statements, and physical damage patterns to help determine which vehicle entered the intersection lawfully and which driver may have run the red light.
The statute of limitations for most personal injury lawsuits is three years from the date of the collision. If you fail to file a lawsuit before this three-year deadline expires, you may lose your legal right to pursue the lawsuit in court.
A T-bone accident can leave you dealing with serious injuries, medical bills, missed work, and questions about who was responsible. When fault is disputed, you may also face conflicting accounts of what happened and difficult conversations with insurance adjusters.
At Brett McCandlis Brown & Conner, our team has stood beside injured people across Washington for more than 40 years. We have recovered over $100 million for our clients, although past results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. We know how to investigate intersection wrecks, preserve crucial video evidence, and hold negligent drivers accountable. We handle injury cases on a contingency-fee basis, which means you pay no legal fees unless we successfully win compensation for you.
Let our attorneys protect your rights so you can focus on getting your life back. Call Brett McCandlis Brown & Conner today or fill out our confidential online contact form to schedule your free consultation.
Legal References Used to Inform This Page
To ensure the accuracy and clarity of this page, we referenced official legal and other resources during the content development process:
Matt Conner has a proven track record of success. Following his graduation from Willamette University with a double major in mathematics and economics, Matt worked as an economist for the Office of Economic Analysis for the State of Oregon before moving onto working in mortgage banking and real estate. Although Matt would move on to law school shortly thereafter, his experience in the financial sector has provided him with valuable experience in how to achieve maximum compensation for his clients.